Comments on: PFW Compared the Eagles to Who? http://insidetheiggles.com/2009/06/11/pfw-compared-the-eagles-to-who/ A Philadelphia Eagles Blog Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:18:55 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Scott Tunstall http://insidetheiggles.com/2009/06/11/pfw-compared-the-eagles-to-who/comment-page-1/#comment-2490 Scott Tunstall Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:51:02 +0000 http://insidetheiggles.com/?p=4200#comment-2490 I'm with you on the Saints. They added a lot of players and more importantly coordinator Greg Williams, who always seems to coach Top 10 defenses. Packers switching to 3-4 will take time. As much as I hate to admit, I think the Cowboys will be much improved now that they threw out the trash. Their secondary is still a question mark, but I like those three RBs (especially Felix Jones). I’m with you on the Saints. They added a lot of players and more importantly coordinator Greg Williams, who always seems to coach Top 10 defenses. Packers switching to 3-4 will take time.

As much as I hate to admit, I think the Cowboys will be much improved now that they threw out the trash. Their secondary is still a question mark, but I like those three RBs (especially Felix Jones).

]]> By: Harris http://insidetheiggles.com/2009/06/11/pfw-compared-the-eagles-to-who/comment-page-1/#comment-2489 Harris Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:52:10 +0000 http://insidetheiggles.com/?p=4200#comment-2489 He ignores the fact that the Cowboys were a team full of stars backed up by scrubs -- a lot of big names with little depth. And they were depending on a guy who'd been out of football for a year to man one corner with a handful of rookies as backups, to say nothing about Roy "Powered Toast Man" Williams. (Man, Dallas had a terrible secondary). And I don't know how "deep" the playoffs will be. The Vikings still don't have a QB (and I don't fear the return of Favre). The Giants are hoping rookie WRs can replace Burress and they have questions at LB and, let's face it, QB. The Cardinals have a suspect defense and an offense with no running game that is likely to regress to the mean. The Panthers are a mystery. The Bears? Pfft, next. The Saints will be a problem if they ever grow a defense and Green Bay could be a threat. I could easily see a Saints-Eagles NFCCG. He ignores the fact that the Cowboys were a team full of stars backed up by scrubs — a lot of big names with little depth. And they were depending on a guy who’d been out of football for a year to man one corner with a handful of rookies as backups, to say nothing about Roy “Powered Toast Man” Williams. (Man, Dallas had a terrible secondary).

And I don’t know how “deep” the playoffs will be. The Vikings still don’t have a QB (and I don’t fear the return of Favre). The Giants are hoping rookie WRs can replace Burress and they have questions at LB and, let’s face it, QB. The Cardinals have a suspect defense and an offense with no running game that is likely to regress to the mean. The Panthers are a mystery. The Bears? Pfft, next. The Saints will be a problem if they ever grow a defense and Green Bay could be a threat. I could easily see a Saints-Eagles NFCCG.

]]>