Eagles Draft: Assessing Value And Prioritizing Need
By Pat Roach
The fanbase’s infatuation with elite prospects like Jack and Elliott is completely understandable; justifiable, even. But using a premium pick on either of the two doesn’t seem to fit the organization’s MO. Perhaps Roseman decides that Elliott is the special, complete back that’s worth making an exception for, or that Myles Jack could provide a rare, hyper-athletic and versatile chess piece for a blossoming young defense.
I’d at least hope that the FO would entertain a slight shift in ideology to accommodate the rare talent of such players, but projecting them to do so is purely speculative and not based on any observable evidence, particularly in the case of Jack, who plays a position that was infamously neglected under the previous regime. Not to mention the undeniable influence of Jim Schwartz, whose fingerprints could be lifted from any of the latest defensive acquisitions. Many of Schwartz’s most impactful linebackers, DeAndre Levy and Stephen Tulloch, were drafted in the 3rd and 4th rounds respectively.
At the moment, it appears that the Eagles are poised to take a shot at a premiere defensive back or a quarterback (this is speculation). There have been mixed signals regarding the standing of this year’s crop of quarterbacks.
However, leaping other long-term quarterback needy teams in Chicago and New Orleans, and putting themselves in the position to hop past Chip Kelly’s 49ers if need be, might suggest that the tea leaves are reading QB. The idea of the Eagles still being in the quarterback market makes sense despite the organization’s already hefty investment at the position. Sam Bradford could be realistically cut following the upcoming season, while Chase Daniel is being paid as high-end reserve.
Next: Will Eagles Pursue Elite Wide Receiver?