Kevin Patullo straight up denies A.J. Brown's accusation post Eagles-Rams game

Dallas Cowboys v Philadelphia Eagles
Dallas Cowboys v Philadelphia Eagles | Emilee Chinn/GettyImages

The Vet’s old turf used to swallow field-goal kicks and quarterbacks whole. These days, Lincoln Financial Field swallows momentum instead. One minute you’re humming “Fly, Eagles, Fly,” the next you’re staring at the scoreboard like it owes you gas money. Sunday felt exactly like that—thirty minutes of football that played like a broken jukebox in a South Street dive, then someone finally dropped a quarter in the slot and the hits started blasting.

The storm arrived in the form of Jalen Hurts’s focused intensity. Cameras caught the franchise quarterback in a deep, animated conversation with offensive coordinator Kevin Patullo. Then came A.J. Brown’s jab“at times you can feel like we’re being conservative”—hung in the air. The question was simple: how would the coach respond?

Kevin Patullo faced the media and denied the accusation outright. A reporter asked if the first half was too conservative. Patullo’s answer was immediate and clear. “No. I wouldn’t say 'conservative' is the word,” Patullo stated. He instead pointed to a series of operational failures.

"When those things happen—like we went three and out obviously a few times—you look at, okay, where was the drive starting? What was the breakdown on the play? What happened? How do we stop this? How do we get out of this?" Patullo added. He focused on drive-starting position and play breakdowns. And this was a direct rebuttal to his star player’s very public critique. Meanwhile, the statistical divide was staggering.

A Jekyll-and-Hyde performance defined the chaotic win. The Eagles managed a shocking negative-one net passing yard before halftime. And they found themselves buried in a 26-7 hole. The second half, however, was a different story. The offense exploded for 255 yards. They looked like a completely different unit, playing with their hair on fire.

Patullo acknowledged the drastic shift. “It was a tale of two halves for sure,” he admitted. He credited adjustments for unlocking the offense when it mattered most. But his refusal to use the word “conservative” creates a fascinating disconnect. It highlights a philosophical gap between the play-caller and his playmakers.

A Philosophical Divide Emerges within the Eagles?

The players have been unequivocal. Hurts spoke about ditching a "play not to lose" mentality. Brown demanded to "let your killers do their thing." Their message was a plea for aggressive, proactive football from the opening snap. They believe the team’s talent should dictate the tempo. Patullo, however, sees the early struggles through a different lens.

He frames the issues as situational. “We got stuck in those weird situations where we just couldn’t get it out of there and get it going,” Patullo explained. He emphasized the goal is always to attack. For example, he highlighted the aggressive first drive. The problem is that the following four drives resulted in three-and-outs. This inconsistency is what fuels the frustration.

The Eagles are undefeated yet facing internal questions. The comeback win was spectacular, but it may have papered over real concerns. The offense ranks a dismal 27th overall. This is not the output expected from a roster brimming with pro bowlers. The victory required two blocked kicks, including a walk-off touchdown. You cannot rely on that every week.

Read more: Nick Sirianni assigns blame to himself despite Eagles’ 19–1 stretch

Balance remains the buzzword. Saquon Barkley is averaging 3.3. Numbers don’t lie; they just wait for the call. Can Patullo blend his methodical process with his players’ fiery demands? He must find a way to start games with the urgency they showed when backed into a corner. Otherwise, the sideline conversations may grow louder than the play calls.